I attended the Ohio Educational Technology Conference in Columbus, Ohio, from February 13-15, 2024. This annual gathering is in its second year of returning to a face-to-face model after many successful years of in-person conferences were interrupted by two years of Covid-protocol enforced virtual options. This year’s conference theme was “Syzygy.”
In April, Ohio will be a popular destination for sightseers, looking forward to a rare example of syzygy – the sun, earth, and moon will be aligned in such a way that a total eclipse will be observable across a wide band through the state.
The 2024 Ohio Educational Technology Conference capitalized on this highly-anticipated astronomical event to draw a comparison to the alignment we seek between teaching, learning, and technology. Syzygy.
While we continue to answer the questions about how to most effectively use the technology we have to help more students achieve more, we find ourselves faced with new questions and new challenges, like how to address the sudden proliferation of artificial intelligence tools.
Here are my top takeaways from OETC 2024.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the next big opportunity and the next big problem. When calculators became small and cheap, we wondered what would happen to math class. When Internet search engines came into their own, we wondered what would happen to the reference section of the library. AI has us wondering what will happen to students learning to write papers, computer programs, and just about anything else. I heard lots of examples of how teachers can use AI right now to save time and improve their practice. I likewise heard lots of warnings about students misusing AI or accessing tools they should not. We haven’t established a clear direction around expectations for its use, mostly because what AI can do seems to expand every day. Right now, the only bad answer is to pretend it doesn’t exist and that our students aren’t already using it. Ohio and aiedu.org have collaborated to publish an AI Toolkit for schools and their communities.
- Students consuming information is now an assumption. With so many formats and delivery mechanisms available, curating quality content is the order of the day, not simply providing it. The power of digital technologies has made it easier than ever to have students creating high-quality products of their own. In a year where colleges are debating whether to continue to ask for students’ SAT scores, students are posting links to the books they’ve authored, movies they’ve directed, and songs they have written and recorded and mixed. Tools like Canva, Flip, and Book Creator put the power of publishing to a global audience at students’ fingertips.
- Innovative practice, thoughtfully implemented, is what will lead to a bright future. Keynotes by George Couros, Dr. Chinma Uche, and representatives from Chagrin Falls Exempted Village Schools emphasized overcoming fear and inertia in systemic practice. While chasing every shiny new tech tool creates chaos that leads us nowhere, we likewise cannot rely on what we have always done to get better results for more students. STEM and real-world impact are no longer the privilege of a few students identified as qualified to participate. Each student deserves access to quality instructional materials and tools to achieve what was not possible before. And we cannot rely on doing what we have always done to get results we have never gotten.
The future, and the present, belong to them. Our job as educators has always been, and continues to be, to guide them in creating a better world by aligning the tools, the skills, and the opportunities that they will need.
Syzygy.
could possibly go wrong? The original 1958 classic does a great job of staying on the edge of “plausible deniability” in scaring the bejabbers out of the viewer! I didn’t think the Jeff Goldblum / Geena Davis remake was terrible. In some ways, it was definitely better than the original. For this list, I have to go with the 1958 version because the ending is so much better. “Help me! Please, help meeee!”
Occasionally, I even watch one when the kids aren’t around (Mary Poppins is still one of my all-time favorites). This one took a movie plot that is generally only reserved for trying to unsettle adult audiences, and made it accessible and fun for all ages. It still provokes the question of “what would happen if all the people were gone”, but without the cataclysmic darkness that puts most films like this into the “after the kids go to bed” time slot.
moon) of the Apollo 13 crew has to be scrubbed, a new mission takes its place (saving the astronauts’ lives as they return to Earth). Can you design something to rescue three imperiled astronauts using things like the flight plan cover, duct tape, and socks, before the CO2 levels in the capsule overtake them? 
this movie makes you think, “Well, yeah, what DOES happen to the fraction of a cent that gets dropped off of all those financial transactions?” The rest of the movie is built on the positive and negative interactions between the personalities of the characters, but the thoroughly believable idea of siphoning minuscule amounts of money to create a multi-million dollar bank account, and sticking it to the man, practically dares us not to identify with the cubicle dwellers getting screwed at every turn. And who hasn’t wanted to hand out a little street justice by curb-stomping a laser printer that spouted “
2) 
michaeldroush.org 