Intro to AT for Paraprofessionals

Last night, I had the distinct pleasure of presenting to a small group of individuals who serve as paraprofessionals in my region.  They are part of a grant program between the University of Dayton and Southern State Community College.  As part of their participation in this federal grant program, the paraprofessionals receive paid tuition toward achieving an Associate of Applied Science Degree.

I was invited to speak to this group to give them a quick introduction to the field of Assistive Technology.  Because the participants are already working in schools, they brought a good range of field experience with various assistive technologies with them.

My slides are available at goo.gl/NTS9GZ.

Key points that were made:

  1. Presumed Competence.  Effective implementation of assistive technology begins with a belief that the student is capable of achieving typical academic goals.
  2. Universal Design.  Even the best technology cannot make up for deficits in poorly designed curriculum materials.
  3. Cost and Implementation.  Assistive Technology does not have to be expensive, but it must be used frequently and well-supported to be effective.

Also, they loved Plickers!

PARCC AAF Workgroup Reflections

PARCC = Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
AAF = Accessibility, Accommodations, and Fairness.

On Monday, February 23, 2015, I had the honor of being invited to take part in a workgroup with educators from members of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).  The purpose of this workgroup was to assemble information and lay out an “Educators Guide” to the PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual.  That manual describes the rationale for, and the function of, certain features that are built into the online assessment platform.

I was part of a group charged with (among other things) developing a presentation containing information that would be most applicable for educators who work with students with disabilities.  My colleague from Ohio, Ron Rogers (Ron’s blog, Ron’s Twitter) of OCALI, was part of a similar group focusing on developing similar materials for educators in their work with all students.

A brainstorming session resulted in a thoughtful list of ideas, categories, and points of emphasis.  They also meandered in several directions, as brainstorming sessions often do.  The expertise of the representatives around the table was clearly evident, and it would take some expert facilitation skill to bring the cacophony of ideas into a unified message.

Here are the important points that percolated to the top:

– Accessibility features and accommodations do not reduce learning expectations for students with disabilities.

– Students with disabilities are expected to participate in the assessments, but expectation is not enough.  Accessibility features and accommodations also enable a wider range of students to participate in assessments than is possible with paper-and-pencil assessments.

– Accessibility starts with “access”.  All the accessibility features and accommodations in the world may be available on an assessment, but they will have no effect if access is not provided in the regular learning environment.

When are teachers supposed to take time out of their instruction to teach kids how to operate the technology for the assessments?  They’re not.  The types of accessibility features included in the assessment are precisely the same type of accessibility features that can be used to aid learning the material.  We haven’t done our students any favors if we have them take online assessments after spending their school year doing paper worksheets.

This isn’t about teaching to a test.  It’s about teaching students, with a framework of standards as a guide.  What’s the difference?  It’s the difference between helping me learn how to read, and helping me learn how to pass a reading test.

On a personal note, I have a daughter who has been diagnosed with Autism.  Right now, I have very little confidence that this assessment will provide her a good opportunity to exhibit her mastery of skills and concepts she learns.  I have no doubt of her capability to grasp the standards.  I just don’t know whether she will have the willingness to participate in the online assessment when and where the school expects her to.  This is not anything that is broken about her, it is something that is broken in the current assessment system that relies on a moment-in-time analysis of performance.

But, I can’t make it better by sitting on the outside and whining about it.  I can hope to make it better by rolling up my sleeves and collaborating with some great minds. I’m optimistic about the guide material that will be produced as a result of our work.  I know the system is not perfect, but every step that gets us closer to an entire education system – goals, materials, methods, and assessments – that is truly Universally Designed and refuses to exclude any student due to their disability is a positive step worth taking.

Ready for OETC15!

Tomorrow, I will be making my way to this year’s Ohio Educational Technology Conference, held annually at the Greater Columbus Convention Center, in Columbus, Ohio.

On Tuesday, I get to hang out and “absorb” information.  This is also my time to renew some acquaintances, see if anything grabs my attention in the vendor hall, and slip into a few sessions that interest me.

On Wednesday, I will likely spend most of my time hanging out in E-Pod with the #oetcx crowd.  I’m in the lineup to do a “FREd Talk”.  That session starts at noon in the E-Pod.  “FREd Talks” are like Ignite sessions in that they are limited to five minutes, with a set of 20 slides that auto-advance every 15 seconds.  My FREd Talk this year is titled “Ten Important Things Amelia Wants You to Know.”  Amelia is my 5-year-old daughter.  She has a diagnosis of Autism, and is getting ready to transition to full-day pre-school four days a week.  I’ve learned so much from her in the past 5+ years, and I’ll be sharing a little of that in my five minutes.

Last year, I had the privilege to present another Ignite session, “Three Big Fat Lies Tech Coordinators Tell“.  The experience was exhilarating! That’s why I’m so pumped to get to do this again!

After the FREd Talks, I will be hosting a table conversation at 2:30pm on “Presuming Competence”.  I am hopeful of hearing from participants about how technology can enhance students’ strengths and augment weaknesses, and how technology can help the adults involved with education to Presume Competence in each and every student.

Thursday will be back to “traditional mode”, but I’ll be hanging out in a cool place: OCALI’s Assistive Technology Lab.  At 11:00 AM, I will be presenting “Free Tools to Support the Writing Process“, and at 2:30 I will be part of a group presenting “Tech Tools for Access to State Assessments”.

If you’re at OETC this year, look for me, and say ‘Hi’!  I have a couple of surprises in mind, based on things I’ve learned in the past that have made my conference-going experiences so much better!  Follow me on Twitter at @mdroush, or e-mail me at michaeldroush@gmail.com.  See you there!

Why You’re Misusing ClassDojo Just the Way it Was Designed (and why you should keep using it!)

Towards the end of last year, I read a tweet from an esteemed educator about how horrible ClassDojo is, and how there were no redeeming qualities about it.  [what is classdojo?] I prodded a little at that notion, but the responses were resolute – there’s nothing good about it.  Typically, I tend to believe that there’s nothing inherently useless (or pristine) about any tool, that it’s all in how you use it.  So, this seemed like a good opportunity to put that theory into practice.  The more I looked around, and thought about the subject, the more I realized that most people I’ve seen use ClassDojo (or similar systems) are doing more harm than good to their students.  But, I have also seen plenty of what I would call good examples of ways to use it to build a more effective classroom community.

Practically any time I have watched a classroom teacher see ClassDojo in action for the first time, I watch them fall in love with it like Romeo seeing Juliet on the balcony.  They picture an engaged, well-behaved classroom of students vying for points in a sort of “behavior judo” match (to extend the “dojo” analogy).

Here’s the problem: reducing classroom expectations to a set of instantly-observable protocols does far more to dampen the learning process than to help it.  If I am a student in your classroom and I can go all day (or all week, or all year) without violating a single “class rule” and still not learn anything, your rules stink.

Not to mention the appalling nature of a system that pits students against each other for who can rack up the most points for behaving.  Don’t give me that “My kids love it” line.  Some of your kids love it… the ones who score near the top.  Some of your kids hate it, and you’re doing nothing to help them by continuing to use it.  They know they’ll never “win”, and they will quit trying if they haven’t already.

That said, I don’t believe it should be added to the district pornography filter list.  There are ways ClassDojo (and its ilk) can and could be used by effective teachers to help everyone in their classroom have a positive educational experience:

  • Use it sparingly, not every day.  Understand that any time you use it, the students’ (and the teacher’s) focus is on the scoring system, not the content.
  • Use it as a scaffold for developing skill, not a “token economy” for compliant behaviors that may or may not actually be contributing to real learning.
  • Use real behaviors you want to encourage.  Try including items like “learning from a mistake”, “positive collaboration”, “creative problem-solving”, or “made your team laugh” in your list.  They take a keener observer than “answered a question” or “turned in homework on time”, but they are closer to the stuff of real learning.
  • Use design thinking strategies like “prototype”, “ask expert”, “observe”.
  • Use effective discussion strategies like “restatement”, “challenging assumptions”, “citing evidence”.  Or items from a system like Six Thinking Hats.  The same list of behaviors shouldn’t fit every classroom learning encounter – they should change as often as the classroom learning expectations change.
  • Don’t use behaviors dead people can do.  If your “positive behavior list” includes things like “sitting quietly in one’s chair”, “not interrupting when others are talking,” and “is not disruptive,” you’ve gone beyond managing your classroom to attempting to control it.
  • Let students take it in turns to do the observations. You can do this either on your ClassDojo account, or with another high tech/low tech system.  Peer feedback is powerful.
  • I never use the negative behaviors when I use ClassDojo.  The only time I’ve seen it used what I would call “effectively” is when a teacher caught herself making exasperated statements about how her class was “always doing such-and-so”.  She added that behavior to a ClassDojo list and kept track of it, privately.  Within two weeks, she realized it wasn’t happening as often as she thought, and she was letting herself be too negatively affected when it did.
  • Enter and track groups, not individual students.
  • Don’t track everyone in the class.  Any way you use ClassDojo that makes kids believe their success is predicated on other students doing poorly is probably working against what you really want in your classroom.
  • ClassDojo basically assumes you will use it to track “person X exhibited behavior Y”.  But why not use it for “person X observed behavior Y”, or “person X inspired behavior Y in someone else”?  Those are examples of what teachers really want to see out of their students in their classrooms, and it is absolutely the sort of behavior that should be recognized and encouraged.  It is also the type of behavior that can largely go ignored if we don’t remind ourselves to look for it.

So, there you have it, my few suggestions for how you might effectively use ClassDojo (or any similar behavior tracking system) in your classroom.  I am pretty certain that these suggestions will not be enough for the original detractors I mentioned to say “Well, maybe there could be a good use for this.”  However, even though they inspired me to write it, I didn’t write it for them.  I wrote it for me, and for you.

As always, your comments are most welcome.

 

Elevating and Celebrating Effective Teachers and Teaching (ECET2)

Several months ago, I got an e-mail out-of-the-blue asking me if I would be willing to present at an education conference here in Ohio.  I wondered if this was someone who had been to a session I led at a previous conference, or maybe someone who knew someone who had.  I was wrong on all counts.  The organizers of ECET2-OAC (What is ECET2? What is OAC?) did what anyone does these days when they are looking for something – they Googled.  My “Five Rules” workshop was unique, it was timely, and I had one other secret ingredient – I live in Ohio, under three hours from the conference site!

So, plans were made, and I embarked on a trip to Burr Oak State Park, not knowing if I would even know anyone there!  But the concept of the event was just so different, I had to see what it would be like.  What I found exceeded my highest expectations!  Here are some of my highlights from attending ECET2-OAC on October 29-30, 2014.

Dr. Irvin Scott. – Dr. Scott provided the opening keynote.  He is theDeputy Director for effective teaching in the educational division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and is “the guy” when it comes to the whole ECET2 phenomenon.  His story is a testimony to the power of teachers who have high expectations and who are willing to give their students supportive, safe environments to reach beyond what they knew they could accomplish.  Hear him talk.  Follow him on Twitter.

Colleague Circles – A unique aspect of the ECET2 conference was the Colleague Circles.  While I did not directly participate in any of these, they were organized to be a meaningful time for educators from the same building/district to discuss pressing issues with a guided format.  The format led each team to come to some clear and definite decisions about how their practice will change going forward, and how they can be a positive force for change in their school.

Me, holding a rat snake at Burr Oak State Park.Snakes! – Even though technology, especially social media, has made the globe a more connected place, we are still very different in the places we come from.  Being at a state park in Ohio has its advantages; a serene environment, great spaces to connect, and a ranger who lives for the thrill of putting snakes in the hands of visitors!

A Bluegrass Band – For conferences like this, some of the best conversations can happen in the informal settings beyond the “scheduled agenda”.  In this case, the evening’s entertainment was provided by a local bluegrass band!  Not only was their music excellent, they spent a little time telling us about how they hand-made their instruments!

Lots of new Twitter friends! – One undercurrent to the conference was an emphasis on encouraging educators to try out Twitter as a way of connecting with other educators outside one’s typical network.  Here are some of them: Irvin Scott, Tracy Spires, James Herman, Will Sheets, Derek Hinkle, Melissa Sheets, Connie Cunningham, and Sara Beardsley!  Also, check out the OACTeach Chat hashtag (#OACTeach) on Twitter!

New Perspectives – One of my favorite parts of presenting “Five Rules of Design Thinking to Reach All Students” is hearing what the workshop participants do with the material.  I feel like I’m doing a good job as a presenter when I learn something new from the workshop.  Modeling the process of being a “facilitator of learning” rather than being a “gatekeeper of facts” is important for me when I present to teachers.

The ECET2 “conference model” is intentionally different.  It blends some aspects of traditional conferences with some of the “grass roots” level appeal of EdCamp.   The result was a fun, informative, and eventful time spent by teaches, for teachers, and with teachers.  When teachers spend time out of the classroom, this is an effective way to spend that time.

 

 

#edcampDubC Reflections

We did it.

Saturday, October 4, 2014, was the inaugural “edcampDubC”, held on the campus of Wilmington College in the Boyd Cultural Arts Center.

After I had attended my first edcamp (edcamp Columbus, 3/9/2013) I started asking myself, “Could that work in the rural region where I live?”  The collaboration and energy and enthusiasm during edcamp made me want more of it.  And I wanted to believe that I didn’t have to drive two hours for it.

The most important component to making this happen was that it couldn’t just be my idea and my edcamp.  If I couldn’t find a few people who were excited enough about the concept to make it happen as I was, we would never be able to bring people together for conversations.

I am fortunate enough to be part of a Regional Advisory Council that includes just the people I wanted to bring to the table for such an event:  Gary Greenberg from CET/ThinkTV, Deb Tschirhart from SOITA, Michele Beery from Wilmington College.  The resources and talents that they brought to the table for this event were indispensable.  EdcampDubC would not have happened without them.

About 40 individuals made it to the Boyd Cultural Arts Center for edcampDubC.  I had been told by other edcamp organizers to expect about a 50% no-show rate.  While we had a small-ish group (about 40), we did have more than 50% show up, and a few at-the-door registrations!

What went well:

The facility.  The Boyd Cultural Arts Center was a fantastic facility.  The T. Canby Jones Meeting House (an actual Quaker meetinghouse, attached to Boyd Center) made a great opening and closing gathering place.  The classroom spaces were very good, with available projectors and sound.  There was also an on-site art gallery (featuring Nelle Ferrara’s “Bold Abstractions“), and the Quaker Heritage Center exhibit “The Pity of War: Words and Images of World War I“.  There was plenty to see and do and learn about before ever entering a classroom.

Registration.  I took the idea of using Eventbrite from the organizers of edcampCbus, and I am so glad I did.  The ticketing and check-in process was smooth as silk.  The only think I did wrong was to set the tickets to stop being available at 7:30am the day of the edcamp.  I had to change that to later in the day to allow at-the-door registrations during the 8:30-9:00 check-in time.

Variety and amount of sessions.  edcampDubC was advertised through several different avenues.  We had a good mix of veteran educators, pre-service teachers, Wilmington College faculty, and new teachers in Resident Educator programs.  This provided the perspectives needed for rich, dynamic discussions of many different topics, and made it difficult to decide which sessions to go to!  View the final session board.

Great giveaways.  Sponsorship was not a problem for this event.  Squirrels, IPEVO, Flocabulary, SimpleK-12, Kahoot!, Voki, StoryboardThat, Zaption, and Edutopia all sent items for door prizes at the end of the day!  By adding our edcamp to the calendar of edcamps at edcamp.wikispaces.com, we actually had vendors contacting us requesting to send us promotional items to give away!

I need to give a special shout-out to Squirrels for sending Rebecca Moore to participate in the event and get a first-hand look at what edcamps are all about!

What we can improve next time:

Representation.  I would have liked to have more area administrators at the event.  I don’t think there were any superintendents or building principals.  In order for the ideas that came to light at edcampDubC to continue and grow, building and district leadership will have to be on board.  We need their perspective in the discussions.

Growth.  We had quite a few people who were the only person from their school building/district to attend.  If every one of those educators will come back next year, and bring one or two colleagues, edcampDubC will grow quickly, and be a better event for it.

Social Media Presence.  Several attendees contributed to the social media discussion of the event during the day, but we didn’t do a very good job of emphasizing it in the edcamp registration materials or during the opening session.  Still, there is a good snapshot of what happened during the day via the edcampDubC Facebook page, the #edcampDubC hashtag on Twitter, and a good collection of photos on Pinterest.

Final thoughts:

This was a lot of work.  But it was fun work!

At the end-of-day Smackdown, one attendee said, “I was hesitant to come to this.  I like to know ahead of time what I’m going to learn and what the objectives are.  But I had a great time today, and learned more than I expected to!”  Comments like that, and making some new friends from various places, made all the effort worthwhile!

The following quote from former Wilmington College professor of religion and philosophy, T. Canby Jones, captures the essence of what edcampDubC, and edcamps in general, sought to establish:

“Every student is a teacher and every teacher a student because each hungers to be taught by the voice of Truth speaking through the other.”

– T. Canby Jones, Professor Emeritus of Religion and Philosophy

My Ice Bucket Challenge for ALS Awareness

If you aren’t familiar yet with the Ice Bucket Challenge for ALS Awareness, I don’t know what you’ve been doing for the last couple months.

My dauglydia_icebuckethter, Lydia, took up the challenge, and nominated me.  Because she’s just sorta awesome that way.

Her friends and siblings were more than happy to help douse her with multiple helpings of icy water!

My little boy, her (half-)brother, Quenton, was fascinated with the video.  He loved watching her get splashed and sloshed and soaked!  After he watched the video a few times, he asked the golden question, “Why did they dump all that water on her?”

We explained that there are people who have a disease called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and they need help.  So, people are using this as a way to pass the word around and challenge each other to do a little bit to help.  Along with the water, people are donating to various funds that help people battling ALS.

“So is Daddy going to get water dumped on him now?”

“Yes.”

“Cool!”

“Do you want to help dump water on Daddy?”

“No, I want water dumped on me, too!”

Right in the feels.

So, tonight, Quenton and I are going to take the ice bucket challenge.  As hot as it’s been lately, it’ll probably feel good!

I’m proud to make donations to help this cause.  In my work supporting awareness of Assistive Technology with educators, two of the resources I use a lot are of people who are battling ALS.

One is former New Orleans Saints player Steve Gleason.  His blocked punt in the first post-Katrina game at the Superdome is one of the great mashup moments of sports-meets-real-life.  Microsoft has developed a short video (2:25) that shows some of what Steve is able to do using Surface tablet technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JObFlEvc-Eg

The other is Jason Becker.  Jason is an exceptionally gifted musician, but ALS began taking away his ability to play guitar.  Jason uses some powerful Assistive Technology to communicate, and also to continue to exercise his gift for music and share it with the world.

If you are looking for a place to donate money to help with the fight against ALS, I strongly urge you to consider visiting TeamGleason.org and JasonBeckerMovie.com to show you what your money can do.

Learn.  Give.  Make a difference.  Make a positive difference in someone’s life.

Using the iPad to Support Access to the General Curriculum

The following LiveBinder contains resources used in a presentation at Eastern (Brown) Local Schools on using the iPad to support access to the general curriculum.

http://goo.gl/xEbaKz

Includes great stuff like Rita Pierson, some built in Accessibility features, apps for consuming and for creating content, and information about the Bookshare program.

 

“Never give up. Don’t ever give up.”

The ESPY’s are tonight. You probably don’t care. To be honest, I won’t be watching either.

But one of the greatest moments in TV history ever took place on March 3, 1993 (the ESPYs were in March back then), when Jim Valvano accepted the Arthur Ashe Award. Nobody thought he was really going to be able to stand up when he was introduced, much less walk to the podium and give one of the best acceptance speeches ever.

Laugh. Cry. Think. That’s a full day. That’s a heck of a day.

And, above all, never give up. Don’t ever give up.

Watch the video, and consider making a gift to The V Foundation for Cancer Research.

Presuming Competence

There are two fundamental ideas I hold dear about education: 1) every student deserves to be fully included with his/her peers as much as possible as a basic civil right, and 2) when this is done properly and well, every student in the classroom benefits socially as well as academically.

I owe much of the credit for my current views on this subject to the work of Dr. Elise Frattura and Michael McSheehan, as well as Douglas Biklen’s 1992(!) book “Schooling Without Labels”.

I have collected a list of 30 videos that speak to some aspect of this challenge.  Some are about inclusion in the classroom, some in extra-curriculars.  Some are about inclusion at the elementary level, some in high school, some beyond high school.  Some are about the civil rights aspect, some are about the academic benefits to all.

I have a “typical” six-year-old, and a four-year-old who has been diagnosed with Autism.  I am hopeful that they are going to school at a time when they will never have to be separated from any of their peers on the basis of whether or not they have a disability.  Any school that recommends a separate facility for my kids is not the right school for them.

If you are not already a believer in full inclusion for all, I hope you will be by the time you watch these videos.