Three Tips to Get You Started in Design Thinking

School districts can sometimes feel like giant ocean liners.  They hold a lot of people, but they can take a long time to change direction.  When there are problems that need to be addressed, the process of “Design Thinking” is gaining a lot of popularity as a framework for coming up with innovative solutions.  The process is not necessarily difficult, but the work can be slow-going sometimes.  This can lead individuals, or entire teams, to believe that the process has failed – especially in a field where we want to see significant results quickly from our actions.

You can start small, or start big.  If you’re thinking about exploring “Design Thinking” as a model for approaching your next problem-solving venture, keep these three tips in mind to get the most from the experience.

Empathy.Empathy.  The best results from Design Thinking come when we spend plenty of time on activities that emphasize empathy.  Who is affected by the problem we’re trying to fix?  This step often involves lots of interviews with such people (often termed “users”, as in “users” of the system or product being redesigned), and observing them while using the current system/product.  If your proposed solutions don’t actually help anyone, why were you working on the problem in the first place?  When the Design Thinking process is working well, empathy has been allowed to shape and define our understanding of the problem.

Prepare to fail, and learn from it.  Failure is becoming something of a popular buzzword in education these days.  Reducing the stigma attached to failures is a noble cause.  When we punish failure, we rarely do so in a way that encourages students to try again.  We generally get the opposite result – students learn to stop trying.  We can’t make failure not stink.  If failure feels good, why succeed?  What we can do is cultivate an attitude of learning from failure, and not letting the prospect of failure prevent us from making the attempt.  Prototyping and the iterative process gives us a chance to try, and if that doesn’t work, to go back and try again with new understanding. [View this Stanford d.school slide deck on “Prototypes”]

Green octagon Go sign.Bias toward action.  I have a strong memory of coming out of one especially long meeting at a previous workplace.  The meeting wasn’t necessarily a productive one.  We left with no proposed solutions.  A co-worker of mine put it best when he said, “Well, we didn’t come up with a solution, but we sure admired the problem!”  Too often, we spend a lot of time admiring problems, and not taking steps to resolve it (perhaps owing to the fear of failure mentioned above).  Bias toward action doesn’t mean that we enact solutions without sufficient preparation or thought.  It means that even our closed-lab discussions are concerned primarily with, “What can we do as a result of this?”  A solution that never results in a change in practice is no solution.

Truly enacting a “Design Thinking” framework requires a shift in thinking away from supporting existing systems to supporting eventual solutions.  The results can be spectacular!

Want to know more about applying principles of Design Thinking in schools?  Check out http://www.DesignThinkingForEducators.com!

#EdCampLdrOH

On Monday, July 11, 2016, I was fortunate enough to participate in an EdCamp in Columbus, Ohio.  This was part of a network of events called “EdCamp Leadership” across numerous states and international locations.

Ohio’s event, titled EdCamp Leader Ohio, was held at the unofficial mother church of EdCamps, Clark Hall at Gahanna-Lincoln High School.  (I have previously attended two #EdCampCbus events at the same location, and am hoping to attend this year’s event on September 24.)  Clark Hall is an excellent example of learner-centered architecture.  Classroom spaces are flexible.  Collaboration spaces are open and well-furnished. Considerable attention has been paid to minimizing barriers to learning.

A great big thank you to Dr. Neil Gupta (@drneilgupta), and GLHS Principal Bobby Dodd (@bobby__dodd) for all the preparation and planning work!

Here are my big take-aways from the event:

  • Before we talk about what we do and how we do it, it’s never a bad idea to reaffirm why we do it.  It’s unusual (though certainly not unheard of) for an edCamp to start with a keynote, but #EdCampLdrOH’s opening keynote with LaVonna Roth was the perfect type of message for an event of this nature.
  • Movie clips have great potential as illustrative material for profesional development as well as instructional design.  Today’s educator should understand copyright law and “fair use” principles as part of a school’s digital citizenship effort.
  • Discussions about how we might construct and conduct courses on current events and social justice issues naturally lead to real-life application.  At this point, things like credits and grades and other artificial means we use to motivate students become secondary, or even irrelevant.
  • Educators want to develop effective ways to help students identify and utilize their strengths.  Time, relationship-building, and identifying authentic audiences are key parts of this effort, and it takes some boldness to break out of standards maps and pacing guides to lay this foundation.
  • All of our recent efforts at reform and school improvement have done little to transform, or clarify, what it really indicates when we hand a student a high school diploma.  The discussion about what a high school diploma means can drastically change the conversation about what school should look like.  It’s a system-wide application of the principle of Backward Design as explained in “Understanding by Design” – designing with the end in mind.  (ASCD Whitepaper, “The Understanding by Design Framework” [PDF])

Take a look at the day’s “Big Board” and follow the links to any of the resources posted from those sessions.  If you’ve never been to an EdCamp before, I highly recommend that you try it.  Look for one in your area, and plan to attend!

What is an edcamp?

ISTE 2016

ISTE 2016 Logo_Full Logo_Full Color

When I accepted a position as a Technology Integration Specialist with Forward Edge, one thing I found out was that I would be attending my first ever ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) Conference.  This year’s conference was held at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver, Colorado.  I know a lot of my EdTech friends didn’t have the opportunity to go, so I thought I would pass along some of my biggest takeaways.

  • We have to start with a focus on our instructional strategies and expectations.  If you start your decision-making process with “what the tech can do” and then try to cram it into your existing instructional system, you’ll be frustrated.  If you start with what you want instruction to do for all students, and then find the tech that supports and amplifies that, you’ll be transformed. [ Transforming Teaching and Learning with an Authentic Audience (YouTube: 15:56) ]
  • Programming is big.  Kids should learn about coding, and learn to code.  Coding involves math, science, literacy and pre-literacy skills, critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving.  These are skills that we want every one of our students to develop and learn to use in real-world circumstances.  This is really scary for teachers who don’t know how to code, but there are some resources out there that make it a lot easier.  [ Free resources: Code.org | Scratch ] [ Hardware Kits: Makey Makey | Raspberry Pi |  Project Bloks by Google and Wired.com article on Project Bloks | littlebits | Ozobot ]
  • It is worth the time spent getting a vision for what sort of world our students are heading into.  What will the world be like in five years, or ten, or twenty, or fifty?  Are we preparing kids for that world, or the world fifty years passed?  And what sort of a societal change do we want these students prepared to make? [ Wrap-up of Dr. Michio Kaku’s keynote | Wrap-up of Dr. Ruha Benjamin’s keynote ]

 

ISTE Ignite PhotoI was also fortunate enough to have the opportunity to participate with two brief presentations.  Some friends of mine made “home video” recordings of my presentations, via Periscope, now on YouTube:

I’m already looking forward to ISTE 2017 in San Antonio, TX, June 25-28, 2017!  If you have the opportunity to go, I would love to see you there!

Two Presentations – Ten Minutes

This year, I have the pleasure of attending my first-ever ISTE conference, thanks to the good folks at my new workplace, Forward Edge.

I also have the added privilege of giving two presentations!

My “Five Rules of Design Thinking to Reach All Students” presentation was accepted as part of “ISTE Ignite Sessions – Round 1” on Sunday, June 26 at 1:30 PM (MDT, 3:30 PM EDT).  The Ignite format means I have prepared 20 slides, and they will auto-advance every 15 seconds, giving me a grand total of five minutes for my presentation.  I’ve done versions of my “Five Rules” work in lots of different time blocks (fifteen minute TEDx, one hour, two hour, all-day ), but this will be my first time doing it in the five-minute Ignite format.  As difficult as that sounds, it’s all about the preparation, and being settled on just exactly what I want to say for each of my slides, and “sticking to the script”.

Then, I will team up with my friend Stacy Hawthorne to be part of a forum session titled “Making Ed Tech Stick!”  Multiple presenters will again have five minutes each to talk about proven strategies that have helped schools use educational technology to truly transform the way we teach.  My presentation there will be titled “Three Big Fat Lies Tech Coordinators Tell”.  Two presentations.  Ten minutes.  And lots of opportunity to enjoy and learn from others’ presentations along with mine!

Will you be at ISTE?  Or perhaps you will be part of the #NotAtISTE16 crowd?  Either way, I look forward to learning from the overwhelming amount of interaction that comes out of this conference every year!

Learn more about the Ignite format, and see some great Ignite talks at their website, IgniteTalks.io.

Ten Important Things Amelia Needs You to Know

Ohio’s State Professional Development Grant (SPDG) provides resources for select districts to participate in important work around changing outcomes and improving achievement for diverse learners.

I was honored to be asked to speak at a state-level meeting of SPDG district representatives at the Battelle for Kids “Connect for Success” conference.

My presentation was titled “Ten Important Things Amelia Needs You to Know”.  Big thanks to my friend Patti Porto for getting video of the presentation for me!

The slides are available at goo.gl/8YisM1.

Teaching Left-handed Kids

Some students in today’s educational system are left-handed.  These students have unique educational needs compared to their typical peers.  Common academic activities such as handwriting, drawing, and using scissors require varying levels of modification to accommodate the needs of individuals who are left-handed. Even playtime activities like baseball or golf require alternative or modified equipment to allow students who are left-handed to participate more fully.

Teachers may find it frustrating at first to deal with the unique needs of students who are left-handed.  The constant need to modify assignments can take up a significant amount of the teacher’s valuable time that could be spent in assisting other students. Also, teacher preparation programs do relatively little to familiarize new teachers with the unique needs of this small but important part of the population. These factors contribute to a lack of success for students who are left-handed in typical classrooms.

To maximize efficiency and effective use of limited resources, all students who are left-handed should be educated in a separate educational environment. Students who are left-handed should be provided with a teacher who has specialized credentials in working just with these students. The opportunity for the students to spend most of their time alongside similar individuals will build a greater sense of camaraderie and community. This will also benefit the classroom teachers who will no longer have to spend their time modifying work for students who are left-handed. And, it will benefit the typical students who have previously faced distraction from their studies due to having students who are left-handed in their classroom doing things differently, needing extra assistance, or working in separate groups from typical students.

To enhance these students’ sense of belonging to the school community, we will begin the steps necessary to put together resources to provide activities like sports teams and cheerleading squads for students who are left-handed. We are very excited to announce our first planned event will be a prom, next Spring, only for students who are left-handed!

We are committed to increasing our efforts in early identification of students who are left-handed. Early identification of students who are left-handed will help us provide necessary services that will help increase success of students who are left-handed in a specialized functional curriculum, to give them the best chance of adapting to life after school in a workplace and world dominated by right-handed individuals.

Okay, does all that stuff above seem really stupid?  Yes?  Good.  Now, take out the phrase “Students who are left-handed” and replace it with “students who have Autism” or “Downs Syndrome”or “students who are deaf” or “blind” or any other label we place on students. Why would we think that removing those people from the presence of their peers in classrooms is any more helpful, or any less discriminatory, then doing so with students who are left-handed, or green eyed, or of a particular race?

Just include.

See You Soon, Wilmington College

Friday, May 13, 2016, will be my last day with the IT Department at Wilmington College.  I have had a wonderful experience here for the last nine months.  At a time when I needed a change, the opportunity to come to Wilmington College was so coincidental that it is hard to explain it away as pure happenstance.  Wilmington College is a special place, with a lot of special people working hard to make it that way.  They made me feel like part of the family from day one, and that’s the sort of experience that makes a deep impact on a person.

I’m sad that I’m leaving here.  There are so many nice people.  It’s a beautiful place to work.  The college atmosphere is alive with energy and drive.  Wilmington’s Quaker heritage emphasizes a set of core values that give that energy a focus and direction, much like the rudder on a ship.  In fact, I never would have considered leaving here if not for an offer of a job working as a Technology Integration Specialist.

There are two factors that cushion the blow.  First is that I will be doing something I love.  I will have the opportunity, every day, to work with educators on how to use available technology to help every student achieve more.  I used to say that is the sort of thing I would love to do all the time if the chance ever became available.  Now it has.  Second, I have spoken with the Education department at Wilmington College about coming back here for the Spring 2017 semester to teach two Technology in Special Education classes.  Teaching college classes was one of my favorite professional experiences ever, and I feel like I have so much more to bring to the table now than I did then.  I eagerly anticipate the opportunity to come back, and to remain part of the Wilmington College family.

So, it isn’t “good-bye,” DubC.  It’s “See you soon.”

In Defense of “Participation Trophies”

So-called “Participation Awards” are getting a lot of flak these days.  When the subject is pilloried in mainstream advertising, you know a chord has been struck.  However, I firmly believe that there is a valuable place in what we are trying to teach kids.  But, only if we use it for the right purpose.

Keeping score, tournaments, championships, and even the nature of competition itself are all about one thing: are you better than your opponent(s) at something?  You don’t have to be the best ever.  You don’t have to be the best today.  You don’t even have to be as good as you were last week.  Just as long as you are better than your opponent today, you will win.  You will succeed.  You will get the trophy.

However, if that is all we are trying to teach kids with our sports programs, we have missed the most valuable part of learning to play a sport by a million miles.  Learning to play a sport is not about being better than our opponent on any given day.

Yes, that’s what we hand out championship trophies for, and that’s absolutely okay.  But if that is our only focus in whatever sports season is going on, we’re wasting a great opportunity.

The so-called “Participation Trophies” aren’t about making sure nobody’s feelings are hurt, and they aren’t about making everyone feel equal (even when it’s obvious that they are not).  Or at least they shouldn’t be.  Participation Awards are about recognizing that every individual athlete who participated to the best of their ability got better at something.

The “Participation Trophy” by itself does nothing.  It might even do more harm than good, if kids get the notion that they don’t have to put forth any effort at all, and they will get the same award everyone else gets.  If that’s how you are awarding “Participation Trophies” in your team or league, fix it!  “Participation trophies” are meaningful when they are accompanied by specific, meaningful feedback about how the athlete has improved, how they have gotten better during the course of the season.

I can already hear someone protesting, “But, you don’t need to get a trophy for that!”  And you’re right.  You don’t need to get a trophy for that.  The Lombardi Trophy or the Stanley Cup don’t really make winning the NFL or NHL championship any greater of an accomplishment either, but I can’t imagine a championship game ending without the winning team hoisting that trophy.

So, why is it important?  The trophy is important because it is a symbol.  It is a symbol of the fact that this individual or this team to which the trophy has been awarded was better than their competition at the required moment.

There is nothing wrong with awarding symbols to individuals (in athletic competition or otherwise) for improving their skills, for being better than they were a year ago, a month ago, a week ago, rather than just being better than their opponent.

Should we give out participation trophies?  Absolutely.  But, every kid who receives one should understand why they got one.  It isn’t just because they were present for all or most or some of the games and practices.  And it isn’t to keep them from having hurt feelings that someone else got a trophy and they didn’t.  And it is absolutely not to give mom and/or dad the illusion of their little one being a superstar prodigy.

Try this scenario on for size.  At an end-of-year team celebration for a youth basketball league, every player on the team was due to receive a trophy.  A participation trophy.  The object of so much scorn and scoffing.  But, in this case, rather than just handing the trophies out and giving a generic “good job, everyone,” the coach took a few seconds to tell everyone something specific about how that student had improved during the season.  It was meaningful for each of the students, it was meaningful for the parents, and it was meaningful for the coach to go through the process of assessing each student’s skill development during the season.  These were not glib, general statements.  “When Bobby started this season, he couldn’t dribble a basketball with his left hand.  Now, he is able to dribble with his left, and switch hands while dribbling, and that has helped him do better at getting closer to the basket and scoring!”  Is Bobby the best left-hand dribbler out there?  No.  Did Bobby win a championship?  No.  But Bobby did something important.  Bobby worked hard to get better at something, and there is no harm in identifying and acknowledging that accomplishment.

For participation trophies to have any meaning, a coach (or teacher, etc.) must be constantly evaluating students’ skills and development, providing support and direction when needed.  Otherwise, participation trophies become just an equally-distributed expense with no impact.  A symbol, with no substance.

 

 

TEDx Worthington on YouTube!

All nine of the TEDx Worthington talks are now available via the TEDx YouTube channel.

Here they are, in the original order of presentation:

  1. Steve Kucinski – “Resolve to Enjoy the Goodness and Beauty in Each Other and in Life”
  2. Tom Burton – “Finding Resolution: Questioning the Answers”
  3. Cheyenne Buckingham – “Why school lunches need to be resolved”
  4. Chris Hasebrook – “A Different Public School Model”
  5. Eric Genezda – “Prep Period”
  6. Anna Farrell – “Success? How our competitive culture affects our students”
  7. Michael Roush – “Five Rules of Design Thinking to Reach All Students”
  8. Trent Bowers – “Why Kids Need Co-curricular Activities”
  9. Cindy Foley – “The Benefits of Boredom”

This was an incredible experience for me.  From the discussions during and after the event, I feel comfortable in saying it was a similarly incredible experience for the other speakers as well.

Some day, I believe one of these will be TED’s featured “Talk of the Day”, and I can think of reasons why any of them might be featured one day on NPR’s “TED Radio Hour”.

And when it happens, every one of us who were part of TEDxWorthington will smile and cheer!

TEDx Worthington

What a day!

On Friday, February 26, I left my office at Wilmington College to drive to Thomas J. Worthington High School for a practice session for the inaugural TEDxWorthington.  A circle of red carpet is probably the most intimidating piece of fabric I’ve even seen.  Seeing that circle of carpet is probably when it finally sunk in for me that this was really going to happen.  I would stand on that circle of red carpet with the “TEDx” blocks behind me and deliver my best fifteen minutes.

I was one of nine speakers selected to speak on Saturday, February 27, 2016.  Our venue was the McConnell Arts Center, a magnificent space for such an event.

I knew two of the other speakers.  That is to say, I knew of them, thanks to connecting with them via Twitter as fellow Ohio educators.  Other than that, these were strangers to me.  But, we shared something important in common: a passion for education.  And that passion had led each of us to propose to be part of this event.

The event was scheduled for 1:00 – 5:00 PM, which seems like an awfully long time to sit and listen to people talk at you.  But, engaging talks, coupled with a 20-minute “intermission” after each set of 3 speakers, kept things fresh.  I took the stage a full 2½ hours after the event started, and the audience was not weary of the format.  TEDx Worthington lead organizer Jerry Obney told me on Friday before my practice session, “The audience will all be pulling for you.  They want you to do well.”  And he was right.

I took some very important lessons and observations away from each of the other eight talks.

Steve Kucinski – Don’t forget to feel.  And don’t wait until it’s too late to show that you care.

Tom Burton – “Know thyself.” Don’t be afraid to ask questions, of others and yourself.

Cheyenne Bunckingham – The problem of nutrition in education is a complex one, but that means we should focus on it all the more, rather than merely meeting minimums and leaving that as good enough.

Chris Hasebrook – Education can be different.  If we decided school doesn’t have to look like it did in the past, what sort of future could we create?

Anna Farrell – A student is a person, not a transcript.  And we’re all better when we choose to collaborate rather than compete.

Eric Gnezda – Like Rita Pierson said, “Every student needs a champion.”  Never underestimate the impact you can have on a student’s life, especially outside of the “prescribed curriculum.”

Trent Bowers – The life-lessons of co-curricular activities should never be underestimated.  Does every student have the opportunity to participate and learn those lessons?

Cindy Meyers Foley – Boredom does not have to be a bad thing. As a matter of fact, some of the most creative ideas the world has ever known came from people who were trying to find a way to eliminate being bored!

Re-watching the video of my talk was not something I wanted to do, but I thought I probably should. I have some irritating “nervous tendencies” when I speak.  I need to work on that.  And hopefully I will have plenty of opportunities to do so.

My biggest takeaway from this event is a reminder that everyone has a story that is worth telling.  And that means everyone has a story that is worth hearing.  I have so many opportunities to hear amazing stories every day, and it’s long past time I started making the time to listen to them.